Офтальмологическая диагностика: технологии, методики и клиническое применение

1.5 Conclusion

High- and low-contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures are useful screening param­ eters to help the clinician understand the patient’s complaints. They are also important outcome measures to quantify the effectiveness of any intervention or to understand the disease progres­ sion. Inadequate awareness of the techniques used to measure these visual function parameters among clinicians can lead to errors in

­documentation and intervention. Although these are commonly noted as quick measures, appro­ priate thresholding techniques should be used while recording to avoid over/underestimating the same. Vulnerable groups such as children (particularly those with special needs) and indi­ viduals with visual impairment are likely to need extra time and care, as there could be a wider test–retest difference in their visual function parameters owing to the severity of the condition and overall developmental delays.

Acknowledgments  We thank Ms. Shakthi Pradheepa for her help with the figures.

Funding  Funding Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

Disclosure  None.

References

  1. Snellen H. Test-types for determination of the acute­ ness of vision, vol. 44. Utrecht: van de Weijer; 1862. p. 520.

  1. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1976;53(11):740–5.

  1. Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91–6.

  1. Woo G, Lo P. A Chinese word acuity chart with new design principles. Singap Med J. 1980;21(5):689–92.

  1. Al-Mufarrej MM, Abo-Hiemed FA, Oduntan AO. A new Arabic distance visual acuity chart. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(1):59–61.

  1. Datta S, Varadharajan S, Mazumdar D, et  al. Construction and validation of LEA Hindi chart: a multicenter study. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(5):351–9.

  1. Hyvarinen L, Nasanen R, Laurinen P.  New visual acuity test for pre-school children. Acta Ophthalmol. 1980;58(4):507–11.

  1. Taylor HR.  Applying new design principles to the construction of an illiterate E chart. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1978;55(5):348–51.

  1. Pointer JS, Gilmartin G, Larke JR. The evolution of the broken ring visual acuity test figure. J Am Optom Assoc. 1980;51(8):741–5.

  1. Laidlaw DAH, Tailor V, Shah N, et  al. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measure­ ment system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(2):241–4.

  1. Fantz RL.  Visual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965;118(21):793–814.

  1. Sumalini R, Satgunam P.  Grating acuity tests for infants, young children and individuals with ­disabilities: a review of recent advances. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022;38:76.

  1. Runge PE.  Eduard Jaeger’s test-types (Schrift– Scalen) and the historical development of vision tests. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:375–438.

  1. Blesi M, Wise BA, Kelley-Arney C. Medical assisting administrative and clinical competencies. Cengage Learning; 2011.

  1. Colenbrander A, Runge P.  Can Jaeger num­ bers be standardized. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(13):3563.

  1. Kaur K, Gurnani B. Contrast sensitivity. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580542/.

  1. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ.  The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2(3):187–99.

  1. Njeru SM, Osman M, Brown AM.  The effect of test distance on visual contrast sensitivity measured using the Pelli–Robson chart. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(2):32.

  1. Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A.  The reliabil­ ity of the Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10(1):21–4.

  1. Hopkins GR 2nd, Dougherty BE, Brown AM.  The Ohio contrast cards: visual performance in a pediatric low-vision site. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(10):946–56.

  1. Arditi A.  Improving the design of the letter con­ trast sensitivity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(6):2225–9.

  1. Anderson HA, Mathew AR, Cheng H. Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43(1):64–72.

  1. Kniestedt C, Stamper RL. Visual acuity and its mea­ surement. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2003;16(2):155– 70. v

  1. Volpe NJ.  Adler’s physiology of the eye: clinical application. J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2004;24(4):348.

  1. Satgunam P, Datta S, Sumalini R.  Near vision in individuals with down syndrome: a vision screening study. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(8):1254–60.

  1. Nandakumar K, Leat SJ.  Bifocals in children with down syndrome (BiDS)—visual acuity, accommo­ dation and early literacy skills. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(6):e196–204.

  1. Owsley C, Sloane ME.  Contrast sensitivity, acu­ ity, and the perception of ‘real-world’ targets. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71(10):791–6.

  1. Rubin GS, Schuchard RA, editors. Does contrast sensitivity predict face recognition performance in low-vision observers? Noninvasive assessment of the visual system. Nevada: Optica Publishing Group; 1990.

  1. Xiong Y-Z, Kwon M, Bittner AK, et al. Relationship between acuity and contrast sensitivity: differ­ ences due to eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(6):40.

  1. Ginsburg AP.  A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Optom Vis Sci. 1984;61(6):403–7.

  1. Lesmes LA, Lu ZL, Baek J, Albright TD. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity func­ tion: the quick CSF method. J Vis. 2010;10(3):17–21.

  1. Mowry EM, Loguidice MJ, Daniels AB, et al. Vision related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: cor­ relation with new measures of low and high con­ trast letter acuity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(7):767–72.

  1. Johnson CA, Casson EJ. Effects of luminance, con­ trast, and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(12):864–9.

  1. Blindness and Vision Impairment: Definitions. https://www.who.int/news-­room/fact-­sheets/detail/ blindness-­and-­visual-­impairment. Accessed 4 July 2023.

  1. Bittner AK, Ibrahim MA, Haythornthwaite JA, et  al. Vision test variability in retinitis pigmen­ tosa and psychosocial factors. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(12):1496–506.

  1. Bailey IL, Jackson AJ, Minto H, et  al. The Berkeley rudimentary vision test. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(9):1257–64.

  1. Morad Y, Werker E, Nemet P. Visual acuity tests using chart, line, and single optotype in healthy and ambly­ opic children. J AAPOS. 1999;3(2):94–7.

  1. Friedman DS, Munoz B, Massof RW, et al. Grating visual acuity using the preferential-looking method in elderly nursing home residents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2572–8.

  1. Anstice NS, Jacobs RJ, Simkin SK, et al. Do picture-­ based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of kay pictures, lea symbols, HOTV and Keeler log- MAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170839.

  1. Sumalini R, Satgunam P, Subramanian A, Conway M. Clinical utility of ‘Peekaboo Vision’ application for measuring grating acuity in children with down syndrome. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022;18(1):18–26.

  1. Park SH, Park CY, Shin YJ, et al. Low contrast visual acuity might help to detect previous optic neuritis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:602193.

  1. Balcer L, Raynowska J, Nolan R, et  al. Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23:135245851769082.

  1. Hyvarinen L. LEA contrast sensitivity. https://www. leatest.com/sites/default/files/pdf/ContrastSensitivity. pdf. Accessed 29 June 2023.

  1. Leat SJ, Legge GE, Bullimore MA.  What is low vision? A re-evaluation of definitions. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(4):198–211.

Дальше — с подпиской Awamed+

Осталось ещё 463 страницы источника. Подписка открывает материал целиком вместе с оригиналом, рисунками и файлами.

Подключить Awamed+Уже подписаны? Войти